24 Dec 2021
RE DE SILVA ANTHONY MENEKA KUMARASENA
- Citation
- [2021] HKCA 1947
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV532/2020
The motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was dismissed because the intended appeal had no merit: the purportedly new 2005 letter was not properly explained and failed the Ladd v Marshall test for fresh evidence, the second letter had already been considered and rejected by the adjudicator as not contemporaneous or probative, and no question of great general or public importance (nor any basis under the 'or otherwise' limb) was shown under s.22(1)(b) HKCFAO.