Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Hong Kong decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal granted direct leave, allowed the mother’s appeal, set aside the refusal of an injunction, and made interim child-protection orders with no order as to costs.
上訴法庭駁回梁淑微就拒絕司法覆核許可的上訴，裁定她只是重申原有不滿，未顯示原審有原則性錯誤。
上訴法庭剔除一宗未先向原訟法庭申請上訴許可的上訴通知書，並撤銷相關傳票，認為並無特殊情況可直接向上訴法庭申請。
The court dismissed a summons to adduce 125 pages of late-disclosed documents in a probate dispute, holding the plaintiffs had not justified a delay of about 2.5 years.
The District Court refused a post-acquittal costs application by the 1st Defendant, holding that his conduct during investigation gave positive reasons to deny costs.
The court refused leave to appeal because the father's grounds failed to show any obvious error of fact or principle in the trial judge's exercise of discretion: the 12‑month supervision order was a lawful, reasonable measure within the judge's assessment of the parties' communication and the child's welfare; social welfare reports are advisory; the custody award to the mother did not evidence a reversible error; and the application therefore lacked a reasonable prospect of success. Costs were awarded against the applicant.
Source excerpt
The court ordered each party to bear its own costs of a discovery summons, finding no fair basis to apportion costs after withdrawn, narrowed and contested requests.
The court joined Jean-Marc Peretti as a defendant, refused defendants’ interpleader relief, ordered further disclosure, delivery up to an independent custodian, and payment of proceeds into court.
The Court ordered Clustertech Limited to pay the Plaintiff’s costs of the summons and granted a certificate for two counsel.
Defendant became a trespasser from 16 March 2023 for remaining in the premises after expiry of the tenancy; mesne profits are payable at the contractual rent of HK$18,500 per month from 16 March 2023; plaintiffs did not accept a binding extension to 15 December 2023 and any purported partial acceptance in the 12/5/2023 correspondence does not create a binding agreement; deposit refundable only upon delivery of vacant possession and full payment, which conditions are unmet; defendant's counterclaim dismissed; costs to plaintiffs on party-and-party basis.
Source excerpt
Explore more
