19 Nov 2013
UES INTERNATIONAL (HK) LTD v. MARITIMA MARUBA SA
- Citation
- UES INTERNATIONAL (HK) LTD v. MARITIMA MARUBA SA
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA632/2011
The court permitted the plaintiff to file the Amended Reply and supplemental witness statement despite lateness because justice required the real issues be tried and no real prejudice was shown, but imposed indemnity costs against the plaintiff and solicitor-level sanctions for procedural breaches; separately, the ex parte Mareva injunction was discharged because the applicant failed to make full and frank disclosure of material assignments to the ex parte judge and re-granting was refused absent a satisfactory innocent explanation.