31 May 2018
YIU HO WING v. CHINA EASE INVESTMENTS LTD
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 1498
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP960/2017
Because the applicant had been validly removed as a director prior to the hearing his locus to seek inspection as a director ceased; however the removal occurred at an eleventh hour and the company and adverse shareholders had been aware of the applicant's intention to inspect since 2015, so fairness required an award of costs to the applicant for the originating summons; leave to adduce the defendant's late affirmation was granted and no costs were ordered for that summons or for the withdrawn amendment summons.