23 Aug 1995
R. v. CHEUNG HON CHUNG
- Citation
- R. v. CHEUNG HON CHUNG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC84/1995
The sentencing judge did not err in refusing to treat unproven assertions in mitigation as established facts or in declining to warn defence to call evidence; the 16-year starting point was supportable on the admitted facts and the final sentence of 8 years after discount for cooperation was not manifestly excessive.