19 May 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to advance viable grounds before the Judge, offered only general unsupported assertions, could not identify any error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision (notably its credibility findings and COI assessment), and therefore his intended judicial review had no realistic prospect of success.
15 May 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to advance any viable or particularised grounds to show a reasonably arguable public law error in the Board's decision; the Judge correctly found the intended judicial review had no reasonable prospect of success and there was no basis for disturbing that refusal.
6 May 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any specific error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the judge's refusal of leave; absent viable grounds the Court of Appeal will not overturn the judge or re‑adjudicate the Board's factual assessments.
30 Apr 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error in the judge’s refusal to grant leave; the grounds were general allegations lacking particulars and therefore no viable basis to overturn the judge’s decision.
23 Mar 2026
The leave application is dismissed because the intended challenge to the Board's decision is not reasonably arguable: the Board lawfully and rationally considered the evidence and COI, found low risk, adequate state protection and viable internal relocation, and there was no procedural unfairness or error of law warranting judicial review.
6 Mar 2026
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the statutory threshold in section 22(1)(b) was not satisfied (no question of great general or public importance); the applicant relied on new, fact‑sensitive grounds not previously argued; and the submissions were unsubstantial and unarguable, so leave could not be granted.
2 Mar 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error in the judge's refusal to grant leave; the grounds advanced were bare allegations without particulars and did not amount to a viable basis to reverse the judge's decision.
25 Feb 2026
Leave was refused because the Board had considered the Applicant's evidence and grounds, the Applicant had legal representation and opportunity to be heard, and there was no identified error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision; the Applicant lacked a reasonably arguable case with a realistic prospect of success.
19 Dec 2025
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance, failed to identify any error in the Court of Appeal judgment or any viable ground of appeal, and the intended appeal had no reasonable prospect of success; there was also no basis under the "otherwise" limb of s 22(1)(b).
14 Nov 2025
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable grounds of judicial review or any error of law by the Deputy Judge; accordingly there was no basis to disturb the Deputy Judge's refusal to grant leave.