8 Mar 2024
The application for leave was dismissed because it was filed out of time without adequate explanation and the applicant failed to identify any question of general or public importance as required by s.22(1)(b) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance; lack of legal aid does not excuse the delay.
31 Oct 2022
The notice of motion was dismissed because the applicant's notice was significantly delayed with no explanation and she failed to identify any question of great general or public importance or any arguable merit to justify leave; accordingly it was futile to extend time and leave to appeal was refused.
22 Aug 2022
The Notice of Motion was dismissed because it was filed one month late without adequate explanation and failed to identify any question of great general or public importance as required by section 22(1)(b), so there was no basis to extend time and granting leave would be futile.
10 Sept 2021
Extension of time to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the applicant was 18 days late, provided only a bare allegation of not receiving the judgment without particulars, failed to demonstrate any arguable merit or any question of great general or public importance under section 22(1)(b), and consequently the exercise of the Court of Appeal's discretion to extend time was not warranted.
14 Aug 2003
The court refused to grant a certificate under s.32(2) because the issue concerning disclosure of a prosecution witness's convictions did not constitute a point of law of great and general importance.