6 May 2026
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance or any error in the Court of Appeal judgment and there was no basis to grant leave under the 'otherwise' limb of s22(1)(b).
6 May 2026
The applicant's Notice of Motion was dismissed because she failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484, did not particularise errors or raise reasonably arguable grounds for the Court of Final Appeal, and there was no basis to grant leave under the "otherwise" limb.
25 Feb 2026
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b), raised no reasonably arguable ground of error in the Court of Appeal judgment, and failed to comply with Registrar directions to file written submissions, and there was no basis under the "otherwise" limb to grant leave.
4 Feb 2026
Dismissal of the Notice of Motion and refusal of leave followed because the applicant was substantially out of time without good grounds, failed to seek relief from sanction after an unless order, failed to comply with court directions, and did not identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b).
23 Oct 2025
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant’s grounds were confined to case‑specific factual complaints, did not identify any question of great general or public importance as required by section 22(1)(b), were vague and not argued on the appeal, and there was no basis under the "or otherwise" limb to grant leave.
13 Oct 2025
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance or any error in the Court of Appeal judgment, and the intended appeal had no reasonable prospect of success; consequently there was no basis to grant leave under s22(1)(b).
16 Sept 2025
The applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under section 22(1)(b) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance; her assertions were broad, vague and factual matters for the Board, and there was no basis under the 'or otherwise' limb to grant leave, therefore the notice of motion for leave to appeal was dismissed.
22 Jul 2025
The applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance required by s22(1)(b), his submissions were broad and vague and insufficient to justify leave, and no basis was shown under the 'or otherwise' limb; accordingly the application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was dismissed.
22 Jul 2025
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap.484, the matters advanced were broad and vague and largely factual (properly for the Board), and there was no basis under the ‘or otherwise’ limb; additionally the applicant had abandoned written submissions by failing to comply with directions.
16 May 2025
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant's grounds were confined to his individual factual circumstances, did not raise any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) and were unarguable; therefore the statutory threshold for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was not met.