15 Jul 2022
Leave to appeal under s 22(1)(b) was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance, and the proposed appeal had no merits and no reasonable prospect of success, so there was no basis to exercise the discretion to grant leave.
10 Sept 2021
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under section 22(1)(b) Cap 484 and failed to advance any specific or arguable ground that could disturb the Court of Appeal's judgment; therefore leave was not justified.
26 Jul 2019
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484, did not demonstrate any error in the Court of Appeal's judgment, and his bare assertion of risk of return and claimed lack of knowledge or resources did not justify granting leave or excusing delay.
27 Feb 2019
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's complaints were either not raised below or already addressed, the grounds were not reasonably arguable, and they were case‑specific rather than raising questions of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484; no basis existed under the "otherwise" limb.
8 Jan 2019
The Notice of Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of general or public importance under s.22(1)(b) Cap.484 and no basis was shown under the 'or otherwise' limb; personal safety fears alone do not satisfy the statutory threshold for leave.