12 Apr 2024
The application for leave was dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate that the intended appeal raised a question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484 and failed to show any prospects of success on the intended appeal.
25 May 2022
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) and there was no basis to grant leave under the 'otherwise' limb; the Notice of Motion was dismissed.
29 Dec 2021
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance in the proposed appeal and no basis was shown under the "otherwise" limb of s 22(1)(b), so the Court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application for leave.
25 Mar 2020
The Notice of Motion was dismissed because it was filed about fifteen months late without adequate explanation for the delay (a bare allegation of detention), and the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) HKCFAO or any other basis to justify leave; accordingly leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused.