2 Apr 2014
CHAN TAT WAH AND ANOTHER v. KARLSON C & C LTD
- Citation
- CHAN TAT WAH AND ANOTHER v. KARLSON C & C LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP3398/2013
The court granted extension orders under s122 for the companies whose breaches were inadvertent, caused no prejudice and were within a period where prosecution remained possible (Joy Excel and Well Creation), but dismissed originating summonses for companies whose breaches occurred more than three years earlier and were therefore time‑barred from prosecution (Karlson and Wealth Trinity); applications made solely to satisfy Stock Exchange listing requirements where no prosecution risk exists are unnecessary and should be refused to protect court resources.