27 Nov 2015
HKSAR v. TIN HOI YAN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. TIN HOI YAN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA377/2015
Conviction upheld because the evidence supported the magistrates findings that the payments were loans/advantages accepted by a prescribed officer without Chief Executive permission contrary to s.3 POBO; corrupt motive and triviality are not required elements of the offence; the magistrate lawfully assessed credibility and good character and her findings were open on the evidence.