1 Mar 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 嚴志豪
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 623
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA222/2023
基於現場環境證據(深夜將滿載貨車駛近未亮燈大馬力快艇、八人連成人鏈搬運貨物、被告之尾門在貨物搬運期間未關及被告迅速駛離並提供自相矛盾的說法),唯一合理且不可抗拒的推論是被告當時明知貨物無艙單並有意協助他人經海路輸出,裁判官正確拒絕被告之開脫證供,定罪不不安全不穩妥。
1 Mar 2024
基於現場環境證據(深夜將滿載貨車駛近未亮燈大馬力快艇、八人連成人鏈搬運貨物、被告之尾門在貨物搬運期間未關及被告迅速駛離並提供自相矛盾的說法),唯一合理且不可抗拒的推論是被告當時明知貨物無艙單並有意協助他人經海路輸出,裁判官正確拒絕被告之開脫證供,定罪不不安全不穩妥。
21 Jul 1989
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed because the trial judge, who saw and heard the appellant, reasonably rejected his explanations as implausible and inconsistent and there was no misdirection; the appellant accordingly failed to rebut the s.46 presumption for each trafficking charge.