12 Apr 2018
WINTA INVESTMENT (HONG KONG) LTD v. NG KAM CHIT
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 342
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1620/2012
The plaintiff failed to prove on the facts that the defendant solicited its customers after leaving employment; the court preferred the defendant's and Noble Gainer's contemporaneous evidence over the plaintiff's inconsistent witness accounts; because solicitation was not established the claim fails and is dismissed (no need to enforce Clause 9).