16 Feb 2026
TUNG LAI LAM 同時代表30萬的香港精神病患者 對 東網有限公司及另三人
- Citation
- [2026] HKDC 290
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEO12/2024
The strike‑out and refusal of relief were mandated because the pleaded claim was time‑barred under DDO s82(1) and Limitation law, the aspects directed at the successor corporate defendant were barred by res judicata (prior final determination in DCEO 5/2009), the claim against the website operator constituted an abuse of process (Henderson v Henderson principle) with no realistic prospect of success, the claimant failed to establish an appropriate defined representative class, recusal and anonymity were unsupported, and costs and a restrictive litigation order were justified by repeated, unme…