2 Dec 2022
HKSAR v. RAJA RAJESWARY P KAGASFARON
- Citation
- [2022] HKCA 1518
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC196/2020
The court held that grounds 1–3 were not reasonably arguable because the judge properly exercised discretion on the lies direction, there was no breach of the right to silence given inconsistent statements, and directions on defence evidence followed specimen directions. However, grounds 4 and 5 (extensive judicial interventions and an allegedly unbalanced summing-up with possible factual errors) raised reasonable arguable issues about appearance of fairness and were sufficient to grant leave to appeal against conviction on those grounds.