20 Mar 2014
HKSAR v. YIP KIM PO AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. YIP KIM PO AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMC12/2013
The Court refused leave to appeal: the two proposed points of law were fact‑sensitive or did not arise on the evidence (the contracts were sham so veil‑piercing was unnecessary; the s25 question was irrelevant on the facts), and no substantial and grave injustice was shown because the evidence against the applicants was ample and the trial judge properly assessed credibility and inferences.