19 Mar 2025
CHINA EVERGRANDE GROUP (IN LIQUIDATION) v. HUI KA YAN AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 898
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1080/2024
Because Xia intentionally failed to comply with a reinstated ancillary asset disclosure order, made no timely application for extension, and because an application for leave to appeal or a summons seeking a stay does not operate as a stay or extend time, the balance of prejudice favoured enforcement; an unless order debaring Xia from filing a Defence unless he complies by the set deadline was justified and was granted with costs to the plaintiff.