9 Mar 2018
R,CS v. C,L
- Citation
- [2018] HKFC 32
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC7811/2015
Sole custody and sole care and control were vested in the father because the paramount consideration (the child's welfare) favoured the father's stable and nurturing home, social welfare and clinical psychologist reports supported supervised access for the mother, the mother failed to comply with court directions and there were credible concerns about her mental health and unpredictable behaviour; supervised defined access and an updated social investigation in 12 months were ordered, a Section 18 declaration was granted and the father was authorised to renew the child’s passport/visa without…