13 Aug 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 廖為國
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3078
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA439/2022
On rehearing the High Court accepted the magistrate's factual findings that the 23 items were not necessary equipment for the vehicle nor personal effects for reasonable self‑use; the magistrate reasonably disbelieved the appellant's implausible explanations based on common sense and photographic and other evidence, did not reverse the burden, and his questioning fell within permissible judicial functions; therefore the conviction was safe and was upheld.