19 Apr 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 梁伊媛
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 1083
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA290/2020
The court held the circumstantial and environmental evidence established the appellant's control/possession of the 374 counterfeit items and the appellant failed to adduce sufficient evidence to engage the s26AAB defence (did not prove she did not know, had no reason to suspect, and that reasonable efforts could not have discovered the counterfeit nature). The alleged conflict or incompetence of trial counsel did not amount to a real risk of unfairness. Accordingly convictions on both counts and the sentences were safe and were affirmed.