25 Mar 2021
The application for leave to appeal out of time was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance as required by s22(1)(b) Cap 484, failed to show any error in the Court of Appeal's judgment or any real prospect of success, and failed to give a satisfactory explanation for the delay.
19 Aug 2016
Leave to appeal out of time was refused because the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay and, alternatively, the sentence was within the judge's discretionary range and not manifestly excessive.
12 Aug 2015
The Court held that the 20-year starting point for 0.79 kg cocaine was unassailable, a 1-year enhancement for the international element was within judicial discretion and not excessive, family and humanitarian grounds did not justify further reduction, and the out-of-time application had no merit and was dismissed.