31 Jan 2018
HKSAR v. WONG YAT MAN, SUNNY
- Citation
- [2018] HKCA 35
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC16/2016
The Court held that, considering the timing, the sham nature and gross overvaluation of the jade transaction, the acquisition and deregistration of Bright Jade, the applicant's conduct and failure to explain the transactions, the only irresistible inference was that the applicant knowingly conspired to defraud Maryo and knowingly dealt with the proceeds; convictions on both charges are safe and the out‑of‑time renewed application for leave to appeal is dismissed.