24 May 2013
WPP MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS (HONG KONG) LTD v. CHRISTOPHER O’DONNELL
- Citation
- WPP MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS (HONG KONG) LTD v. CHRISTOPHER O’DONNELL
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA637/2013
Interlocutory injunction in respect of clause 22.2(a) refused because plaintiff failed to establish cogent evidence justifying the 12-month restraint and failed to particularise confidential information with sufficient precision; the covenant was excessively wide and the plaintiff had adequate alternative protection via undertakings (defendant and Posterscope) and was guilty of unexplained delay; therefore plaintiff did not demonstrate sufficient prospects of success to justify final-type relief at interlocutory stage.