29 Oct 1996
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TAT FUNG ENTERPRISES CO. LTD.
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TAT FUNG ENTERPRISES CO. LTD.
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV135/1996
The appeals were dismissed because the appellant failed to adduce material facts to rebut the statutory presumption in s33(8) of the Buildings Ordinance and did not establish that the structures were not annexed such that the s26(1) notices were ineffective; therefore there was no meritorious defence to set aside the default judgment.