17 May 2019
CHEUNG YUEN NI v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE IN COUNCIL
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1290
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL177/2015
The court held that the CEIC did not breach the Tameside duty, that any non‑disclosure of the PER during the consultation did not demonstrate substantial prejudice to the applicant or public and thus did not invalidate the process, and that it was not irrational for the CEIC to assess air quality having regard to the standards applicable to the project preparatory work; accordingly the judicial review was dismissed.