29 Nov 2022
F v. W
- Citation
- [2022] HKFC 257
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC6824/2016
The applications were dismissed because the undertaking embodied in the consent 2020 Order could not be varied; the respondent's retirement and reduced income were known and foreseeable at the time the undertaking was given and the increase in the adult child's tuition resulted from decisions known to respondent and not unforeseeable, so no material change justified discharge or variation; likewise no material change justified varying the modest maintenance for the minor child Y under s11 MPPO.