27 Aug 2021
CHU KONG AND ANOTHER v. LAU WING YAN AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2021] HKCA 1251
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAMP151/2021
Leave to appeal was refused because the judge properly exercised his discretion: the Chu Camp delayed unreasonably such that matters were stale; the purported 'new findings' were not materially new; the ex parte application involved material non‑disclosure of prior court processes; there was no real risk of dissipation warranting Mareva relief; a proprietary injunction over estimated profits was not justified; indemnity costs were appropriate given the conduct and abuse of ex parte process.