7 Jun 2021
PAN SHI LIANG v. HARSEN INDUSTRIES LTD
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 1682
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1917/2017
The court refused to make a further indemnity order because the applicant failed to produce evidence sufficient to show what loss the company suffered, what recovery could realistically be achieved, the costs already incurred and estimated future costs, the company's financial position, and the extent of overlap with pending unfair prejudice petitions; absent that material the court would not prudently order the company to fund further litigation and therefore adjourned the application with liberty to restore.