3 Jul 2006
RE PETER DAVID LANGE
- Citation
- RE PETER DAVID LANGE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP3335/2004
LPO s.74C unambiguously requires satisfaction of the specified old s.27 criteria (including ss.27(1)(e) and (1A)); it does not preserve the discretionary power under the repealed s.27(2)(b), so the Court has no discretion to admit the applicant under s.74C; alternatively, even if such discretion existed, the applicant's qualifications are not sufficiently exceptional or in the public interest to justify admission.