29 Feb 2000
"W" v. "I"
- Citation
- "W" v. "I"
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV219/1999
The judge properly exercised his discretion in refusing access because extensive social welfare and psychological evidence established that access would pose a substantial risk to the child's mental health; the Court of Appeal will not disturb such a discretionary decision absent error of law or misapprehension, and the imposition of a three-year period before reconsideration without leave was within the judge's remit.