5 Sept 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 劉炳光
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 4128
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA463/2024
On a full re‑hearing the court accepted the complainant's evidence as honest and reliable, found the appellant's account confused and unreliable (particularly about the 'wash mouth' documentation), held the alleged bad behaviour was not treated as similar‑fact evidence and was not pivotal, accepted that distress/post‑incident conduct was not relied on as corroboration, found no inherent impossibility in the complainant's account, and concluded the prosecution proved both counts of indecent assault beyond reasonable doubt; the appeal was dismissed and convictions and sentence affirmed.