14 Feb 2007
WADDINGTON LTD v. CHAN CHUN HOO THOMAS AND OTHERS
- Citation
- WADDINGTON LTD v. CHAN CHUN HOO THOMAS AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV220/2005
Leave to appeal was refused because the questions posed were either too general in the face of established exceptions (no reflective loss/Foss v Harbottle), or premature and fact-sensitive such that unresolved factual inferences rendered the matters unsuitable for determination by the Court of Final Appeal at this stage; the amendment issue was procedural and did not justify leave.