29 Aug 2008
UDL CONTRACTING LTD v. WATER SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HKSAR
- Citation
- UDL CONTRACTING LTD v. WATER SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HKSAR
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT28/2008
Leave to appeal was refused because the arbitrator did not plainly exceed jurisdiction or commit an obvious error: he lawfully considered the Scheme of Arrangement and the Scheme Administrator's assessment as strongly indicative of the likely net position, limited his determination to interest up to the Effective Date, and there was no demonstrated egregious factual misapprehension warranting leave.