25 Jan 2016
HKSAR v. LUK KIN PETER JOSEPH AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LUK KIN PETER JOSEPH AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC283/2014
The Court refused to certify points of law because no question of law of great and general importance arose from its decision; it held that the phrase 'acting for another' in s.2 POBO is not limited to persons under a legal/contractual/fiduciary obligation and that agency may be inferred from circumstantial evidence, and that minutes of a board of directors may fall within 'other document' when they are business records within an agent‑principal relationship.