25 Oct 2023
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant's claim sought impermissible merits review and broad constitutional clarification (including the scope of 'patriots governing Hong Kong') that are non‑justiciable on judicial review principles, and the application had no real prospect of success.
26 Jul 2012
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused for the same reasons given in HCAL 90 of 2012: the applicant's challenge concerning eligibility to stand for election was not appropriate for judicial review (premature, non‑justiciable or capable of being addressed by alternative remedies).
4 May 2000
The petitioner remained an ordinary resident despite temporary studies abroad and therefore was eligible to stand; the 1st respondent's decision invalidating her nomination was incorrect; consequently the 2nd respondent was not duly elected and no other person was duly elected, and the 1st respondent must pay the petitioner's costs with the specified arrangements and release of security.