19 Aug 2024
SIT KAN TAT v. WORLD CLASS TALENT LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2024] HKDC 1295
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCPI3632/2020
Leave to appeal was refused for both defendants because none of the intended grounds demonstrated reasonable prospects of success or raised issues in the interest of justice: the post-pleading evidence was admissible and pleaded in substance, employability was properly found on the evidence, pandemic did not negate causation absent proof to that effect, contributory negligence and apportionment findings were not plainly wrong, pleading defects were not shown to have caused prejudice, and mitigation points were not pleaded and so could not succeed. Costs were awarded to the plaintiff.