20 Sept 2002
LAM CHI FAT v. LIBERTY INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE
- Citation
- LAM CHI FAT v. LIBERTY INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA3232/2001
The Statement of Claim, read sensibly as a whole, pleaded that Foo Yan was the plaintiff's employer and alleged breaches giving rise to injury in the course of employment; consequently the default interlocutory and subsequent assessment judgments quantified Foo Yan's employer liability under the ECO, the insurer had sufficient notice under s.43(2)(b), and therefore the defendant insurer (successor to Provincial) was liable to pay the Judgment Sum and taxed costs sought by the plaintiff.