29 Dec 2022
S,PJ v. S,CE nee D,CE
- Citation
- [2022] HKFC 288
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC664/2012
The variation application was dismissed and the Cost Order Nisi was made absolute because the husband had advanced wholly unsupported and unreasonable allegations (the alleged verbal agreement and increased time with the child), had been in breach of the AR 2013 Order, and the trial judge properly exercised discretion under Order 62, rule 5(2) to order costs against him (50%).