7 Apr 1994
R. v. LAU PAT YAU
- Citation
- R. v. LAU PAT YAU
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA115/1994
The Magistrate's conviction was upheld because the admissible evidence (including the appellant's admissions) supported the finding that the appellant failed to keep a proper lookout and collided with the cart; there was no admissible evidence proving the asserted bicycle existed or caused the accident, so the Magistrate was not required to accept the appellant's speculative explanation.