2 Feb 2011
HKSAR v. LI KA MAN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LI KA MAN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA824/2010
The touching of the complainant's buttock, coupled with the appellant's post‑incident remark implying pursuit, established both the act element and the requisite indecent intent; the part of the body touched made the conduct indecent regardless of low force or playfulness, and the delay in reporting did not undermine the magistrate's credibility findings, therefore the conviction and the two‑week sentence were upheld.