26 Jul 2022
劉互慈 v. 張永輝（張偉賢之遺產執行人）
- Citation
- [2022] HKDC 768
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ2990/2020
The appeal was dismissed because the defendant failed to demonstrate any defence with a real prospect of success or other discretionary reason to set aside a regularly entered default judgment; the plaintiff produced credible documentary evidence of the loans and the defendant's limitation defence based on a 31/12/2013 accrual date had no real prospect of success (date taken out of context and due date could have been varied or be as late as July 2014); accordingly the Subject Order dismissing the Setting Aside Summons was upheld, costs awarded to the plaintiff and interim stay on the Chargin…