20 Oct 2010
YIP KEE WAI v. SO KIM WAH
- Citation
- YIP KEE WAI v. SO KIM WAH
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1504/2009
Where Timetabling Questionnaires are misleading or the parties have not identified key issues (notably whether expert evidence will be required), the court cannot give proper directions; substantive compliance with Order 25 rule 1 and Practice Direction 5.2 is required and failure to do so warrants adjournment and disallowance of costs; pleadings should be in a single language and parties capable of using the same language must do so to avoid imposing bilingual judge requirements.