22 Apr 2008
CROWNING SUCCESS LTD v. BRIGHTLAND CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- CROWNING SUCCESS LTD v. BRIGHTLAND CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1540/2005
The appeal was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to plead or adduce evidence to justify departing from the normal rule that damages are assessed at the date of breach; consequently the Master's order requiring disclosure of valuations as at 22 July 2005 (date of alleged breach) and 22 January 2006 (six months later) was proper and must stand.