17 Jun 1988
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. CHOI WING CHEONG AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. CHOI WING CHEONG AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA30/1988
The court held that 'destination' in the export control regime denotes the ultimate intended destination; s.34(1) places the evidential burden on the exporter to prove on the balance of probabilities the intended place of export; because the respondents failed to prove Macau was the ultimate destination they breached the export licence even though the prosecution could not prove actual arrival in North Korea beyond reasonable doubt.