4 Aug 2015
PARK LOMEN INN LTD v. APPEAL BOARD
- Citation
- PARK LOMEN INN LTD v. APPEAL BOARD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP486/2015
Because the applicant served the notice of appeal within the prescribed period and the applicant attempted to lodge the sealed order within seven days but the Registry refused to accept lodgment through no fault of the applicant, the Court granted an extension of time to comply with Order 59 Rule 5(1). On the merits the Court agreed with the judge below that the proposed grounds were not reasonably arguable under the Chan Po Fun test and dismissed the appeal; costs were ordered against the applicant at 90% of the Superintendent's costs.