21 Dec 2015
TONG WING KIN AND ANOTHER v. HURST, TONG TZE MING OPHELIA AND OTHERS
- Citation
- TONG WING KIN AND ANOTHER v. HURST, TONG TZE MING OPHELIA AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP2379/2014
Clause 3 was ambiguous on its face or when read with surrounding circumstances so extrinsic evidence is admissible under s23B; documents relating to drafting and preparation of the Will are relevant and necessary for a fair disposal therefore discovery under Order 24 r 3 is ordered; counsel advices were obtained in the course of estate administration for the benefit of the estate (joint interest with beneficiaries) and not clearly for the executrix's personal benefit, so legal professional privilege does not bar disclosure to the plaintiffs; accordingly discovery of the drafting documents and…