26 Apr 1982
LEE MAN TIN AND ANOTHER v. LEUNG KAM CHEE
- Citation
- LEE MAN TIN AND ANOTHER v. LEUNG KAM CHEE
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ5082/1981
The second plaintiff did not satisfy s.53(2)(b) because the words 'son' and 'daughter' do not include step-children for the purposes of Cap.7; Allied International and Sun Pin are binding and, combined with lack of evidence of genuine present need, require dismissal of the plaintiffs' claim for possession.