26 Oct 2007
ANTHONY JAMES HATTON v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Citation
- ANTHONY JAMES HATTON v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP844/2007
The petitions against four dormant "shelf" companies (HCMP Nos. 846, 848, 849, 851 of 2007) were struck out because the pleaded misconduct did not, in substance or reality, amount to conduct of the affairs of those subject companies; by contrast, petitions against certain property-holding companies, Sparkling Wine, Step Further and Insomnia Singapore were not plain and obvious failures because sufficient interdependence or asserted impacts on those companies' affairs were pleaded. Leave to amend was granted for the petitions not struck out and the petition HCMP 1208/2007 and HCA 2712/2006 wer…