17 Dec 2020
SKK (H.K.) CO LTD 及另一人 對 TSUI PO HING 及另一人
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 3099
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP934/2019
Permission to appeal was refused because the second defendant had no real prospect of success and no other reason in the interests of justice to justify a hearing: he had failed to comply with the 28‑day requirement in Order 28 r1A(4) for filing affidavit evidence after service, had not sought leave in the prescribed manner, the translation of the Legal Charge was irrelevant to enforcement of absolute charging orders, and the applications were frivolous; accordingly both summonses were vacated and costs awarded to the plaintiffs to be paid immediately and summarily assessed.